Gender and racial stereotyping in rape coverage: an analysis of rape coverage in Grocott's Mail

Abstract

This thesis analyzes rape coverage in a Grahamstown newspaper, Grocott's Mail. Critical discourse analysis is used to discuss and analyze articles about rape that appear in Grocott's Mail between October 14th 2008 and October 29th 2009. Drawing on existing literature on 'rape myths' in media coverage of rape, this thesis argues that Grocott's Mail perpetuates racial and gender stereotypes through the way in which it reports on rape. While not all of the articles included in the analysis use rape myths, most use one or more when discussing rape incidents. Specifically, Grocott's Mail tends to use rape myths that blame the victim for the rape and de-emphasize the role of the perpetrator in the rape. This is problematic as it sustains existing racial and gender inequalities.