Mapping Grahamstown's security governance network : prospects and problems for democratic policing

dc.contributor.advisorVincent, Louise
dc.contributor.authorBrereton, Catherine Margaret
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-04T15:48:24Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractThe security of its citizens is often regarded as the democratic state's primary raison d'etre. However, with increasing crime and perceptions of insecurity among citizens, along with actual and perceived state policing inadequacies, citizens around the world have sought to make alternative arrangements for their security. The explosion of private alternatives to state policing has resulted in the need for the replacement of former static definitions of policing by more fluid understandings of what policing entails. Policing is no longer an activity undertaken exclusively by the 'state police.' Policing needs to be understood within a framework which recognises the existence of a variety of state, commercial, community groups and individuals which exist within loose and sometimes informal, sometimes formal, networks to provide for the security of citizens. Preceding the country's transition to democracy in 1994 'state' policing in South Africa was aimed at monitoring and suppressing the black population and as a result it conducted itself in a largely militaristic way. When the government of national unity assumed power in 1994 it was indisputable that the South African Police had to undergo major reform if it was to play an effective, co-operative and accountable role in a democratic South Africa. While state policing has unquestionably undergone enormous changes since the advent of democracy in 1994, so too has non-state policing. It is widely accepted that the dividing line between state and non-state policing in South Africa is increasingly blurred. Policing, by its very nature, holds the potential to threaten democracy. Consequently it is important that policing is democratically controlled. According to the Law Commission of Canada four values and principles - justice, equality, accountability, and efficiency - should support policing in a democracy. This thesis is a case study of policing in Grahamstown, a small city in South Africa's Eastern Cape province. It will be shown that the policing problem that currently plagues Grahamstown, and by extension South Africa, is not simply the result of a shortage of providers but rather a problem of co-coordinating and monitoring security governance to ensure that the city does not further develop into a society where the wealthy have greater access to security than the poor.
dc.description.degreeMaster's thesis
dc.description.degreeMA
dc.format.extent71 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1006323
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchrepository.ru.ac.za/handle/123456789/8684
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherRhodes University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Political and International Studies
dc.rightsBrereton, Catherine Margaret
dc.subjectDemocracy -- South Africa
dc.subjectPolice -- South Africa
dc.subjectPolice administration -- South Africa -- Grahamstown
dc.subjectPolice-community relations -- South Africa -- Grahamstown
dc.subjectCrime prevention -- South Africa -- Grahamstown
dc.subjectPolice patrol -- South Africa -- Grahamstown
dc.subjectPrivate security services -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
dc.titleMapping Grahamstown's security governance network : prospects and problems for democratic policing
dc.typeAcademic thesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mapping_Grahamstown_s_security_governance_network__vital_2851.pdf
Size:
8.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format