Colonisation theory and invasive biota : the Great Fish river, a case history

dc.contributor.advisorHocutt, C H
dc.contributor.authorLaurenson, Lawrie Jon Bain
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-04T07:16:58Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.description.abstractColonisation theory relative to introduced populations was examined with a view to determining the usefulness of theoretical concepts in the prediction of the success of an invasion by a species. To this end, the Great Fish River, with reference to species introduced by the Orange/Fish Tunnel, was used as a case history. It was concluded that theoretical descriptions of population growth, control and decline are useful only when considering individual ecosystems or species. The highly variable nature of species and environments nullifies attempts to simplify behavioural characteristics into a predictive framework. There is an abundance of terminology associated with introduced organisms and frequently many of these terms are used synonymously. Eleven terms have been defined in this thesis with a view to standardising terminology. Characteristics of species and environments which enhance their susceptibility to invasions by exotic ichthyofauna were discussed and summarised. Distribution data concerning exotic fish introduced into the Great Fish River by the Orange/Fish Tunnel has demonstrated that, with the exception of Clarias gariepinus, all remaining exotics have restricted distributions. Only Barbus aeneus appears to be extending its range down the drainage. Age, Growth, reproduction and condition data support the conclusion that, excluding B. aeneus and C. gariepinus, invasive species in the drainage are not performing well. Of the five invasive species (B. aeneus, Labeo capensis, L. umbratus, Gephyroglanis sclateri and Cyprinus carpio), only two have established populations (B. aeneus· and C. gariepinus). Labeo umbratus and C. carpio were present on the Great Fish River prior to the construction of the tunnel and populations of the species could not be distinguished. It was concluded that there is no evidence to suggest that exotic species introduced into the Great Fish River are having a deleterious effect on indigenous, endangered ichthyofauna. Monitoring of the drainage should be continued to ensure that a danger to indigenous species does not develop.
dc.description.degreeMaster's thesis
dc.description.degreeMSc
dc.format.extent129 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1005905
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchrepository.ru.ac.za/handle/123456789/4930
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherRhodes University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science
dc.rightsLaurenson, Lawrie Jon Bain
dc.subjectBiological invasions -- South Africa -- Great Fish River
dc.subjectClarias gariepinus
dc.subjectBarbus aeneus
dc.subjectFreshwater ecology
dc.titleColonisation theory and invasive biota : the Great Fish river, a case history
dc.typeAcademic thesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Colonisation_theory_and_invasive_biota___the_Great_vital_5338.pdf
Size:
10.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format