A comparative study of conceptualisations and practices of inclusion as an aspect of social justice in three teacher education institutions in Canada, South Africa and Zimbabwe

dc.contributor.advisorVorster, Jo-Anne
dc.contributor.advisorGrant, Carolyn
dc.contributor.authorMusara, Ellison
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-04T14:33:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThis study sought to examine understandings and practices of inclusion as social justice in teacher education programmes in three countries: Canada, South Africa and Zimbabwe. While inclusive education has become an issue of increasing importance globally, contemporary research shows that not much attention has been given to the preparation of teachers as a key element in developing inclusive education systems. Recognising that pre-service teacher education is vital to the success and continued development of inclusive educational practice, the purpose of this qualitative study was to better understand the ways in which inclusion is understood and practiced in the field of teacher education. Using Roy Bhaskar's (1978) critical realism as a metatheory and drawing on Fraser's substantive theory of social justice (2008, 2009) and Tronto's ethic of care (1993, 2013), this study explored the extent to which teacher education faculty and teacher candidates understood and practiced inclusion as an aspect of social justice. The data used in this study was generated through individual and focus group interviews and document analysis in three higher education institutions, one in each of the three countries. In Canada, four teacher educators took part in the interviews while five teacher candidates participated in the focus group. Similarly, in South Africa, three teacher educators and eight teacher candidates participated, and in Zimbabwe, four teacher educators and eight teacher candidates took part in the study respectively. Findings from the study revealed that inclusion still means different things to different people, reflecting contrasting theoretical and ideological orientations from which inclusion is considered, while still remaining a major educational policy concern in all three countries. In the Canadian and South African institutions, inclusion is viewed more in terms of systemic educational change in pursuit of equity, social justice and equal educational opportunities for all learners. In the Zimbabwean institution, the primary focus of inclusion remains creating conditions that make it possible for students with disabilities to overcome barriers to learning and participation by providing specialist educational measures and interventions intended to respond to specific forms of impairment. As a comparative study, it is hoped that this study will contribute to the knowledge of variations and patterns in the ways in which inclusive education is shaped by societal forces such as political, economic and cultural conditions.
dc.description.degreeDoctoral thesis
dc.description.degreePhD
dc.format.extent262 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10962/144138
dc.identifier.urihttps://researchrepository.ru.ac.za/handle/123456789/7282
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherRhodes University, Faculty of Education, Department of Education
dc.rightsMusara, Ellison
dc.subjectSocial justice and education
dc.subjectTeachers -- Training of -- Canada
dc.subjectTeachers -- Training of -- South Africa
dc.subjectTeachers -- Training of -- Zimbabwe
dc.subjectEducational sociology -- Canada
dc.subjectEducational sociology -- South Africa
dc.subjectEducational sociology -- Zimbabwe
dc.subjectEducational equalization
dc.subjectInclusive education
dc.subjectEducation -- Moral and ethical aspects
dc.subjectCritical realism
dc.titleA comparative study of conceptualisations and practices of inclusion as an aspect of social justice in three teacher education institutions in Canada, South Africa and Zimbabwe
dc.typeAcademic thesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A_comparative_study_of_conceptualisations_and_prac_vital_38314.pdf
Size:
2.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format