Is economic growth without human development sustainable? : Sub-Saharan Africa's recent growth acceleration in context

Abstract

The purpose of the study has been to assess the question of sustainability of economic growth and human development, particularly using sub-Saharan Africa in context. Sub-Saharan Africa is an interesting case study because, on the one hand, it has been mired in poverty and remains the least developed region in the world, and on the other, it has experienced a revival in economic growth since the mid-1990s. Economists tend to use the term economic development and economic growth interchangeably. However, questions have been raised about whether Africa's latest growth episode is indeed 'development'. Although there are many issues at stake, the key question, and the focus of this thesis, is whether sub-Saharan Africa's revival is sustainable. The paper sets out the debate between the 'World Bank view' and the 'alternative view'. The main debate lies around how genuine development should be achieved. Firstly, the 'World Bank view' claims that economic growth is necessary and sufficient condition to achieve development. Economic growth will be generated by 'orthodox' policies and this growth will automatically trickle-down and stimulate development. Secondly, the 'alternative view' argues that economic growth is necessary but it is not sufficient to stimulate sustainable development. Economic growth without 'qualitative' change is not 'sustainable'. Indeed, human development shortfalls (as well as other, social, political and structural problems), if not addressed through appropriate policy interventions, can undermine economic growth. The 'alternative view' appears to be strongly supported by evidence from other developing regions such as Latin America and East Asia. The empirical study conducted in this thesis reinforces doubts about 'sustainability'. Even though there are signs of convergence in some indicators